Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SAMADHAN SHIVAJI WAGHversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR DEPT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dismissed

Holding

The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the reliefs sought were no longer attainable.

Summary

Petitioner Samadhan Shivaji Wagh filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking certain reliefs against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner later informed the Court that the reliefs he sought had become unavailable. The Court examined whether a petition can be dismissed when the relief sought is no longer attainable. Finding that the reliefs were rendered infructuous, the Court held that the petition could be disposed of without further hearing. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous and no costs were awarded.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed as infructuous when the relief sought has become unavailable

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • infructuous
  • dismissal
  • High Court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                                                  11.WP11864.2022.DOC



                                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                      WRIT PETITION NO.11864 OF 2022

                                Samadhan Shivaji Wagh                                                   Petitioner
                                        versus
                                The State of Maharashtra and others                                     Respondents

                                                                  _______
                                Mr.Anilkumar K.Patil with Mr.Laxmikant Patil, Mr.Digvijay A.Patil for Petitioner.
                                Mr.Jayendra Khairnar with Ms.Gauri Kulkarni for Respondent no.5.
                                Mr.P.V.Nelson Rajan, AGP, for Respondent nos.1 to 3.
                                                                       _______

                                                             CORAM         :      AARTI SATHE, J.

                                                             DATE          :      6th October 2026

                                P.C.

                                             Learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the reliefs as prayed for

                                in the present writ petition have been rendered infructuous. In view thereof, the

                                writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. No costs.




                                                                                  (AARTI SATHE, J.)




             Digitally signed
MANISH    by MANISH
          SURESHRAO
SURESHRAO THATTE
THATTE    Date: 2026.10.06
             17:43:06 +0530




                                M.S.Thatte


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.