Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

AISHWARYA CHANDRAKANT YADAVversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court disposed of the first petition as withdrawn and listed the second petition for urgent hearing.

Summary

The petitioners filed two writ petitions challenging the Maharashtra Public Service Commission's (MPSC) judicial service recruitment processes. In WP/11887/2023, the petitioner had already secured a judicial appointment through the 2022 recruitment, so the petitioner sought to withdraw the petition, which the court disposed of as withdrawn. In WP/14907/2022, the petition was limited to the relief sought by Ms. Tejaswini Gajanan Jaybhaye, with the MPSC indicating it would file an affidavit addressing the petitioners' contentions. The court ordered the matter to be listed for urgent hearing on 2 September 2026. No substantive merits were decided, and the proceedings were procedural.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • judicial service recruitment
  • MPSC
  • withdrawal
  • procedural order

Judgment

          Digitally
          signed by
GAURI     GAURI AMIT
          GAEKWAD
AMIT      Date:                                                         [email protected]
GAEKWAD   2026.08.29
          11:24:49
          +0530

                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                           WRIT PETITION NO.14907 OF 2022
                                                       WITH
                                        INTERIM APPLICATION NO.7889 OF 2023
                                                       WITH
                                       INTERIM APPLICATION NO.10138 OF 2024
                                                        IN
                                           WRIT PETITION NO.14907 OF 2022

                       Neha Ulhas Pathak and Ors.            ….Petitioners
                                Versus
                       Maharashtra Public Service
                       Commission and Ors.                   ….Respondents
                                                      WITH
                                          WRIT PETITION NO.11887 OF 2023

                       Aishwarya Chandrakant Yadav           ….Petitioner
                                Versus
                       The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ….Respondents
                                                      ----
                       Dr. Uday Warunjikar a/w. Mr. Sumit Kate for the Petitioners in
                       WP/11887/2023 and WP/14907/2022.
                       Mr. Shekhar Jagtap for the Respondent, the MPSC in
                       WP/11887/2023.
                       Mr. Ashutosh Kulkarni (through video conferencing) a/w.
                       Mr. Hrutik R. Chavan for the Respondent, the MPSC in
                       WP/14907/2022.
                       Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, GP a/w. Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, Addl. GP and
                       Mrs. P.J. Gavhane, AGP for the Respondent, the State in
                       WP/14907/2022.
                       Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, GP a/w. Mr. B.V. Samant, Addl. GP and
                       Mrs. Pooja Patil, AGP for the Respondent, the State in
                       WP/11887/2023.
                                                      ----
                                               CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ.
                                                                 &
                                                           GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.

                       Gauri Gaekwad                    1 of 3
                                                    [email protected]




                            DATE      : 28th AUGUST, 2026

P.C. :-

                  WRIT PETITION NO.11887 OF 2023


1.              The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits, on

instructions, that the Petitioner has already joined judicial service

through the 2022 recruitment process. The present Petition was filed

with reference to the 2023 judicial service recruitment process.

Therefore, the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this Petition. A

photostat copy of the communication received by the learned

Advocate, from the Petitioner, is tendered to the Court. The same is

marked as ‘X’ for identification.



2.              In view of the above, this Petition is disposed off as

withdrawn, on instructions.



                  WRIT PETITION NO.14907 OF 2022


3.              According to the learned Advocate for the Petitioners,

this Petition is now being considered only to the extent of

Ms. Tejaswini Gajanan Jaybhaye.


Gauri Gaekwad                       2 of 3
                                                     [email protected]




4.              Considering the contentions of Dr. Warunjikar, for the

Petitioners, the learned Advocate for the MPSC, Mr. Kulkarni,

submits that MPSC would file a short affidavit specifically to meet

all the contentions of Dr. Warunjikar. He submits that the affidavit

would be supplied to Dr. Warunjikar and the learned Senior

Advocate, Dr. Sathe, on 1st September, 2026 and would be tendered

across the bar when the matter is taken up for hearing.



5.              List this Petition on 2nd September, 2026 at Serial No.1

in the ‘Urgent Supplementary Board’.




(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.)                       (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)




Gauri Gaekwad                       3 of 3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.