Bombay High Court
SHAGUFTA ANJUM SYED ASGERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed of after directing the Grievance Redressal Committee to decide the representation expeditiously.
Summary
The petitioner, Shagufta Anjum Syed Asger, filed a writ petition after making a representation/complaint to the Grievance Redressal Committee. The petition sought relief from the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The Court examined whether the petition should be entertained directly or referred to the Committee for a prompt decision. It held that the grievance should first be decided expeditiously by the Committee. Accordingly, the Court directed the Committee to decide the matter swiftly and disposed of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be entertained by the Court or referred to the Grievance Redressal Committee for a prompt decision
Subjects
- writ petition
- grievance redressal committee
- administrative law
- disposal of petition
- expeditious decision
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42010-DB
wp11944-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.11944 OF 2026
Shagufta Anjum Syed Asger PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Mobin H. Shaikh Tarek, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent - State
Mr. M. V. Ghatge, Advocate for Respondents No.4 to 6
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 10th SEPTEMBER, 2026
ORDER :
1. Since the Petitioner has made Representation / Complaint
recently, to the Grievance Redressal Committee, the same shall
be decided expeditiously.
2. With these directions, the Writ Petition is disposed of.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp11944-26.doc
Checking your session…