Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VILAS SURYANKANT MAYEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner, Vilas Suryankant Mayekar, filed a writ petition on 12 November 2020 in the Bombay High Court. He failed to appear for the hearing and neither he nor his counsel took any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the relief sought. On this basis, the court considered whether the petition could continue despite the lack of prosecution. Finding no justification for continuation, the court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was recorded by both judges on 29 August 2026.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear and take steps to advance the petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                     84-wp1200.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 1200 OF 2021

            Vilas Suryankant Mayekar                                     …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                              …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Shri. J.P. Yagnik APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            12th November, 2020, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                           1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:05 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.