Bombay High Court
SACHIN SHUBHAMANGALRAO KALE THR GPA SHUBHAMANGALRAO V KALEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that Respondent No. 2 must decide the petitioner's representation on its merits within eight weeks of receiving the order.
Summary
The petitioner, Sachin Shubhamangalrao Kale, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in deciding his representation dated 08 September 2025. The petition was heard by a two‑judge bench of the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad. The Court observed that the representation had not been adjudicated and directed the second respondent, the State of Maharashtra, to decide it on its merits. The order required the decision to be rendered within eight weeks of receipt of the Court's copy. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of with the directive to the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether the State of Maharashtra (Respondent No. 2) should decide the petitioner's representation dated 08‑09‑2025 on its merits within a stipulated time.
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- high court order
- delay in decision
- mandamus
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42639-DB
{1} 46-wp-12024-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
46 WRIT PETITION NO. 12024 OF 2026
Sachin Shubhamangalrao Kale Through GPA Shubhamangalrao V Kale
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
...
Mr. Kailas Hande h/f Mr. Avinash Hande, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mrs. Saie Joshi, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2 to
decide representation of the Petitioner dated 08.09.2025, if not already
decided, on its own merit, within a period of eight weeks from the date
of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…