Bombay High Court
PRANITA BABANRAO NIKALJEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directs Respondent No.2 to decide the representation on its merits within four weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
The petitioner, Pranita Babanrao Nikalje, filed a writ petition challenging the delay in deciding a representation dated 16 July 2024 submitted to Respondent No.2. The High Court examined whether the authority was obligated to adjudicate the representation promptly and on its merits. The Court found no sufficient justification for the delay and ordered the respondent to decide the representation, if not already decided, within four weeks of receiving the order. No substantive merits of the representation were decided in this judgment; the focus was on procedural compliance. The petition was therefore disposed with a directive to the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.2 is required to decide the petitioner's representation dated 16.07.2024 on its merits within a reasonable time.
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative delay
- high court
- procedural order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42638-DB
{1} 47-wp-12025-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
47 WRIT PETITION NO. 12025 OF 2026
Pranita Babanrao Nikalje
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. Rahul Garule, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2 to
decide representation of the Petitioner dated 16.07.2024, if not already
decided, on its own merit, within a period of four weeks from the date
of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…