Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

VILAS SURYAKANT MAYEKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Vilas Suryakant Mayekar filed Writ Petition No. 1203 of 2021 on 11 November 2020 in the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petitioner failed to appear for the scheduled hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after filing. The court noted that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the judges A.S. Gadkari and Kamal Khata dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive arguments or evidence were presented, and the dismissal was entered without further hearing.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition should be dismissed for non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear and pursue the case?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • Bombay High Court

Judgment

                 ssm                                                     86-wp1203.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 1203 OF 2021

            Vilas Suryakant Mayekar                                      …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                              …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Smt. P.P. Shinde APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.

            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            11th November, 2020, neither the Petitioner nor his Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)


          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                           1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:02 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.