Bombay High Court
SANDIP SAKHARAM BACHKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed of as withdrawn, having been permitted to be withdrawn by the Court.
Summary
The petitioner, Sandip Sakharam Bachkar, filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 1205 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra. After filing, the petitioner, through counsel Jagtap Adinath B., requested permission to withdraw the petition, stating that the purpose of filing had been subserved. The Court considered the request and examined whether a criminal writ petition can be withdrawn at the petitioner's discretion. The Bench, comprising Justices Sandipkumar C. More and Vaishali Patil-Jadhav, granted the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the petition was formally disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a criminal writ petition after filing it
Subjects
- withdrawal of petition
- criminal writ petition
- high court procedure
- permission to withdraw
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:41119-DB
931 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1205 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
931 CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 1205 OF 2026
Sandip Sakharam Bachkar
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
__________________________________________________________
Adv. Jagtap Adinath B. for the Petitioner
Mr. G. A. Kulkarni, A.P.P. for State
__________________________________________________________
CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE AND
VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 02, 2026
PER COURT :
1) Learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the petition, as
the purpose of filing the petition has been subserved.
2) The Criminal Writ Petition, therefore, stands
disposed of as withdrawn.
(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV) (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE)
JUDGE JUDGE
Komal Kamble Page| 1 of 1
Checking your session…