Bombay High Court
OMKAR ADINATH NATKE THROU. FATHER ADINATH P NATKEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. SEC. GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPT AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
Leave to withdraw the writ petition was granted, and the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Jitendra Shankar Nijasure, a minor represented by his father, filed a writ petition challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra and its agencies. The petitioner, through counsel, sought unconditional leave to withdraw the writ petition. The respondents, including the State and the CET Cell, were represented by counsel but did not oppose the withdrawal. The Court examined the petitioner's request and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court granted leave to withdraw and ordered the writ petition to be disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to unconditional leave to withdraw the writ petition?
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- civil procedure
- high court
- petition dismissed
Judgment
910-wp-12109-2026.doc
jsn
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally
signed by
WRIT PETITION NO.12109 OF 2026
JITENDRA
JITENDRA SHANKAR
SHANKAR NIJASURE
NIJASURE Date:
2026.09.11
12:15:48
+0530 Omkar S/o. Adinath Natke (Minor) Thru. His ...Petitioner
Father Adinath Pandurang Natke
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ...Respondents
----------
Mr. Ghanshyam K. Chinchole with Mr. Ratan Adhe and Mr. Shubham
Nikam for the Petitioner.
Mr. Nikhil Chavan, for Respondent No.2 – CET Cell.
Smt. Vaishali Nimbalkar, AGP for Respondent – State.
----------
CORAM : R.I. CHAGLA AND
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 10TH SEPTEMBER, 2026.
O R D E R:
1. The learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner has
sought leave to withdraw the Writ Petition unconditionally.
2. Accordingly, leave is granted. The Writ Petition is
disposed of as withdrawn.
[ FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. ] [ R.I. CHAGLA J. ]
1/1
Checking your session…