Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MUKESH JETHALAL SOMAIYA PERSONAL GUARANTOR OF ALAG PROPERTY AND ORSversusATUL HARIRAM RAMANI

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court granted leave to withdraw the writ petition and allowed the petitioners liberty to file an application under Order XXI Rule 58 of the CPC.

Summary

Mukesh Jethalal Somaiya, a personal guarantor of Alag Property & Ors, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking leave to withdraw the petition and instead file an application under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 before the executing court. The respondent, Atul Hariram Ramani, opposed the withdrawal. The Court examined whether the petition could be withdrawn and whether liberty could be granted to pursue the matter in the executing court. It held that the petitioners were entitled to withdraw the writ petition and to approach the executing court under the specified CPC provision. Consequently, the petition was disposed of, with the Court expressly keeping all parties' contentions open for future determination in the executing court.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn with liberty to file an application under Order XXI Rule 58 CPC before the executing court

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • withdrawal of petition
  • execution proceedings
  • Order XXI Rule 58
  • writ petition

Judgment

                                                                      38-WP-12115-2026.DOC

                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                      WRIT PETITION NO.12115 OF 2026

                       Mukesh Jethalal Somaiya
                       Personal Guarantor Of Alag Property & Ors             ..Petitioners
                            Versus
                       Atul Hariram Ramani                                 …Respondent

                       Mr. Sanjay P. Shinde for the Petitioners.
                       Mr. Mutahhar Khan i/by Maulik Tanna, for the Respondent.

          Digitally
          signed by

PRIYANKA
          PRIYANKA
          MADHAVRAO                                CORAM : N. J. JAMADAR, J.
MADHAVRAO KALE
KALE      Date:
          2026.09.29
          10:18:26
          +0530
                                                   DATE     :    28th SEPTEMBER 2026


                       P.C.:

                       1.      The learned Counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions,

                       seeks leave to withdraw the Petition with liberty to file an

                       application under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of Civil

                       Procedure, 1908 before the Executing Court.

                       2.      Leave granted with liberty as prayed for.

                       3.      The Petition stands disposed with liberty to the Petitioners

                       to file an application under Order XXI Rule 58 of the Code of

                       Civil Procedure, 1908.

                       4.      In the event such an application is filed, the Executing

                       Court is requested to decide the same on its own merits.

                       5.      All contentions of the parties are expressly kept open.



                                                                  [N. J. JAMADAR, J.]


                       PRIYANKA                            1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.