Bombay High Court
KAMAL CHANDRA TIWARIversusUNIVERSITY GRANT COMMISSION UGC THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court held that a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner, and accordingly allowed the withdrawal.
Summary
The petitioner, Kamal Chandra Tiwari, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the University Grants Commission. The petitioner, through counsel Mr. Jagdish Aradwad Reddy, later submitted a written request to withdraw the petition. The respondents, represented by Mr. Jainendra Sheth, opposed the withdrawal. The Court examined whether a petition filed under its civil appellate jurisdiction could be withdrawn at the petitioner's discretion. Finding no legal impediment, the Court allowed the withdrawal, disposed of the petition, and ordered that no costs be awarded.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition filed in the High Court can be withdrawn by the petitioner at any stage.
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- civil appellate jurisdiction
- costs
Judgment
902- WP-12159-2025.DOC
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.12159 OF 2025
Kamal Chandra Tiwari ...Petitioner
Versus
University Grant Commission
UGC Thru. Secretary & Ors ...Respondents
_______
Mr Jagdish Aradwad Reddy, for Petitioner.
Mr Jainendra Sheth, i/b Rui Rodrigues, for Respondent No.1.
_______
CORAM: G. S. KULKARNI &
DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.
DATE: 9 SEPTEMBER 2026
P.C.
1. Mr Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner, on written instructions, a copy
of which is placed on record, seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition.
2. Allowed to be withdrawn.
3. Disposed of. No costs.
(DR. NEELA GOKHALE, J.) (G. S. KULKARNI, J.)
Digitally
signed by
SHAMBHAVI
SHAMBHAVI NILESH
NILESH SHIVGAN
SHIVGAN Date:
2026.09.10
11:20:43
+0530
Page 1 of 1
Shivgan
Checking your session…