Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BHAGYASHALI BHASKARRAO JAGTAPversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the respondent must decide the petitioner's representation taking into consideration the transfer policy specified in the Government Resolution.

Summary

The petitioner, Bhagyeshali Bhaskar Rao Jagtap, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the handling of his representation dated 24 August 2026. The petition sought relief concerning the application of a transfer policy contained in a Government Resolution dated 18 June 2024. The respondents, the State of Maharashtra and its officials, were directed to consider this policy in adjudicating the petitioner's representation. The Court examined whether the respondents were obligated to act in accordance with the stated transfer policy. No detailed reasoning was recorded in the order, but the Court concluded that the respondents must decide the representation in light of the policy. Consequently, the petition was disposed of with a directive to the respondents to render a decision within six weeks of receiving the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondent is required to decide the petitioner's representation dated 24‑08‑2026 by taking into account the transfer policy in the Government Resolution dated 18‑06‑2024

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • transfer policy
  • government resolution
  • representation
  • administrative law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43064-DB
                                             1                            69.WP.12176.26.odt

                          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                     BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 12176 OF 2026

                               BHAGYASHALI BHASKARRAO JAGTAP
                                            VERSUS
                             THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH
                                   ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

                                                   ...
                        Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Prasad Devidas Jarare
                                AGP for Respondents: Mr. V.M. Kagne
                                                   ...

                                    CORAM          : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                     ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                    DATE           : 16.09.2026


             PER COURT:

                       Writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent No. 3 to

             decide the representation of the petitioner dated 24.08.2026 by taking

             into consideration the transfer policy in the Government Resolution

             dated 18.06.2024, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of

             receipt of a copy of this order.



             (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                    (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




             habeeb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.