Bombay High Court
CHANDRASHEKAR POPATRAO KALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OHTERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that it may allow the withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to seek an alternate remedy.
Summary
The petitioners, Chandrashekar Popatrao Kale and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. Subsequently, they applied to the Court for permission to withdraw the petition, seeking liberty to pursue an alternate remedy. The sole issue before the Court was whether it could allow the withdrawal of a writ petition while granting such liberty. The Court examined the procedural propriety of permitting a withdrawal and found no impediment to doing so. Accordingly, the Court granted the petitioners’ request, disposing of the writ petition as withdrawn with liberty to avail an alternate remedy.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court may permit the withdrawal of a writ petition with liberty to avail an alternate remedy
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- alternate remedy
- procedural law
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:43025-DB
{1} 33-wp-12192-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
33 WRIT PETITION NO. 12192 OF 2026
Chandrashekar Popatrao Kale And Others
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. S.P. Katneshwarkar, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Learned advocate for the petitioners, on instructions, seeks
permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to avail alternate
remedy.
2. Permission is granted. Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn
with liberty as prayed for.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…