Bombay High Court

Beed Zilla Nyayalayin Karmachari SangatanaversusState of Maharashtra

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court held that respondent No.3 must decide the pending proposal on its merits within four weeks of receipt of the order.

Summary

The Beed Zilla Nyayalayin Karmachari Sangatana filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra seeking a directive for respondent No.3 to decide a pending proposal that had been forwarded by the Principal District and Sessions Court, Beed (respondent No.6) on 8 November 2021. The petitioners alleged undue delay in the decision on the proposal. The High Court, after hearing the parties, ordered that respondent No.3 must consider the proposal on its merits and render a decision within four weeks of receiving a copy of the order. No substantive discussion of the merits of the proposal was made, as the court limited its intervention to ensuring timely adjudication. The order effectively disposes of the writ petition with a specific direction to the respondent.

Issues considered

Whether the High Court should direct respondent No.3 to decide the pending proposal forwarded by respondent No.6 on its merits within a stipulated time

Subjects

writ petition
administrative delay
service matters
High Court
direction to decide
timely adjudication

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43056-DB


                                                 1                 42-WP-12201-26.odt


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             WRIT PETITION NO. 12201 OF 2026

                        BEED ZILLA NYAYALAYIN KARMACHARI SANGATANA
                                            VERSUS
                                    STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                                ...
              Mr. Parag V. Barde, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for Respondents/State
              Ms. Geeta Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 & 6
                                                ...

                                      CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                              ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                        DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026

              PER COURT :

              .            The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent

              No.3 to take decision on the pending proposal of the petitioner,

              forwarded by respondent No.6 Principal District and Sessions Court,

              Beed on 08/11/2021, on it’s own merit, within a period of four weeks

              from the date of receipt of copy of this order.



                  (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)           (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              SVH

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…