Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MADHAV KUNDALIK WAYCHAL AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court orders Respondent No.3 to decide the pending proposals of the petitioners on merit within eight weeks.

Summary

Madhav Kundalik Waychal and others filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra and other respondents. The petitioners had submitted proposals on 02/01/2024 and 29/06/2026 that remained pending. The Court, after hearing the parties, ordered Respondent No.3 to consider and decide those proposals on their merits. The decision must be rendered within eight weeks of receipt of the order. The writ petition was consequently disposed of.

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43059-DB


                                                1                   69-WP-12229-26.odt


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                             WRIT PETITION NO. 12229 OF 2026

                           MADHAV KUNDALIK WAYCHAL AND OTHERS
                                           VERSUS
                          THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                               ...
              Mr. Shivkumar K. Mathpati, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Ms. N. B. Kamble, AGP for Respondents/State
              Mr. Suhas B. Ghute, Advocate for Respondent Nos.3 And 4
                                               ...

                                      CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                              ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                       DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026

              PER COURT :

              .            The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent

              No.3 to decide the pending proposals of the petitioners dated

              02/01/2024 and 29/06/2026, on it’s own merit, within a period of

              eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.



                  (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)          (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              SVH


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.