Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

TRIPTI DEVJYOTI CHATTERJEE ALIAS TANUversusDEVJYOTISHASHANKSHEKHAR CHATTEERJEE ALIAS RAMA CHATTERJEE

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The court allowed the withdrawal of the writ petitions and dismissed them.

Summary

Two writ petitions were filed in the Bombay High Court involving Tripti Devjyoti Chatterjee and Devjyoti Shashankshekhar Chatterjee as opposing parties. The petitioners sought relief, but later informed the court that the disputes had been settled out of court. Both petitioners, through their counsel, requested permission to withdraw the petitions. The court considered the submissions and, noting the settlement, allowed the withdrawal of both petitions. Consequently, the petitions were dismissed and disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether a court may permit withdrawal of a writ petition when the parties have settled the dispute out of court

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • settlement out of court
  • Bombay High Court
  • civil appellate jurisdiction

Judgment

                                                                                      70-WP-12312-2025 (C).doc

                             S.S.Kilaje


                                              IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                      CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 12312 OF 2025

                                   Tripti Devjyoti Chatterjee Alias Tanu                  ...Petitioner
                                   VERSUS
                                   Devjyoti Shashankshekhar Chatteerjee
                                   @Rama Chatterjee                                       ...Respondent
SONALI SATISH
          Digitally signed
       by SONALI

SATISH Date:
               KILAJE


KILAJE 2026.09.02
       14:59:17 +0530
                                                                   WITH
                                                      WRIT PETITION NO. 13969 OF 2025

                                   Devjyoti Shashankshekhar Chatterjee                    ...Petitioner
                                   VERSUS
                                   Tripti Devjyoti Chatterjee @ Tanu                      ...Respondent

                                   _________________________________________________________________

                                   Advocate Kiran Jadhav a/w. Mr. Yash Kamble and Mr. Shubham Kadam
                                   i/b. Mr. Randhir Kale, for Petitioner in WP/12312/2025 and for
                                   Respondent in WP/13969/2025.
                                   Mr. Kishorekumar Shetty, Advocate for Respondent in WP/12312/2025
                                   and for Petitioner in WP/13969/2025.
                                   _________________________________________________________________

                                                                       CORAM      :   SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.
                                                                       DATE       :   1st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
                                   P.C. :

                                   1.         Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for

                                   the respondent in both the petitions.

                                   2.         Learned counsel for the petitioner in both the Petitions submit

                                   that both the matters are settled out of Court and on instructions, seeks

                                   leave to withdraw both the petitions.

                                   3.         Considering the submission of both the learned counsel, both



                                                                    Page 1 of 2
                                                          70-WP-12312-2025 (C).doc

S.S.Kilaje


      the Petitions are allowed to be withdrawn.

      4.        Dismissed and disposed of.



                                                    (SHIVKUMAR DIGE, J.)




                                      Page 2 of 2


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.