Bombay High Court
SHANKAR CHANDRAKANT BATINWARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE ADDITIONAL CHIEF SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is disposed of, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal as an alternate efficacious remedy.
Summary
Shankar Chandrakant Batinwar filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the State of Maharashtra. The respondent State, through its Additional Government Pleader, contended that the petitioner had an alternate efficacious remedy by approaching the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The Court examined whether the existence of such an alternative remedy barred the writ petition. Relying on the principle that a petition may be dismissed when a competent alternative forum is available, the Court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Administrative Tribunal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without further adjudication on the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner has an alternate efficacious remedy in the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal that bars the writ petition.
- Whether the High Court can grant liberty to approach the Administrative Tribunal and dispose of the writ petition.
Subjects
- writ petition
- alternative remedy
- administrative tribunal
- jurisdiction
- high court order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42605-DB
wp12326-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.12326 OF 2026
Shankar Chandrakant Batinwar PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. S. V. Kurundkar h/f Mr. S. A. Nagarsoge, Advocate for
Petitioner
Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026
ORDER :
1. Learned AGP submits that alternate efficacious remedy of
approaching Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal is available to
the Petitioner.
2. The Writ Petition is disposed of by granting liberty to the
Petitioner to approach Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp12326-26.doc
Checking your session…