Bombay High Court
MADHAVI MILIND WAGHAMAREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that Respondent No.3 must decide on the petitioner's proposal within eight weeks of the order.
Summary
The petitioner, Madhavi Milind Waghmare, filed a writ petition seeking a court directive for Respondent No.3 to decide on a proposal submitted by the petitioner on 21 January 2026. The petition raised the issue of whether the court could compel the respondent to make a decision within a specified timeframe. The Court examined the petition and found no impediment to issuing such a direction. Consequently, the Court ordered Respondent No.3 to decide on the proposal on its merits within eight weeks of receiving the order and to communicate the decision to the petitioner. The writ petition was thereby disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can direct a government respondent to decide on a petitioner's proposal within a stipulated period
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative law
- direction
- decision timeframe
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42599-DB
wp12336-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.12336 OF 2026
Madhavi Milind Waghmare PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Ramesh I. Wakade, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026
ORDER :
The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent
No.3 to take decision on the proposal of the Petitioner dated 21 st
January, 2026 on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from
the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the
decision to the Petitioner.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp12336-26.doc
Checking your session…