Bombay High Court
PRIYANKA SUNIL CHAUDHARIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court holds that it may issue a direction to the respondent to decide on the petitioner’s proposal within a specified period.
Summary
The petitioner, Priyanka Sunil Chaudhari, filed a writ petition seeking a judicial direction that Respondent No.3 decide on her proposal dated 11 March 2026. The petition raised the question of whether the High Court could compel a government authority to make a decision on a private proposal within a fixed period. The Court examined the scope of its supervisory jurisdiction over administrative action. Finding no impediment, the Court ordered Respondent No.3 to consider the proposal on its merits and communicate its decision within eight weeks of receiving the order. The order effectively disposes of the writ petition by granting the relief sought.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can direct a government department to decide on a private proposal within a stipulated time
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative law
- direction to government
- judicial review
- decision on proposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42602-DB
wp12351-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.12351 OF 2026
Priyanka Sunil Chaudhari PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Ramesh I. Wakade, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. M. K. Goyanka, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026
ORDER :
The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent
No.3 to take decision on the proposal of the Petitioner dated 11 th
March, 2026 on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from
the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the
decision to the Petitioner.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp12351-26.doc
Checking your session…