Bombay High Court
SAINATH RAMESH PUNDEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed Respondent No.3 to decide on the petitioner's proposal within eight weeks and communicate the decision.
Summary
Petitioner Sainath Ramesh Punde filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a directive that Respondent No.3 decide on his proposal dated 11 March 2026. The petition raised the issue of whether the court could compel the administrative authority to make a decision within a specified time. The Court examined the merits of the petition and the need for timely administrative action. It concluded that the petitioner was entitled to a prompt decision and exercised its jurisdiction to issue a directive. Accordingly, the Court ordered Respondent No.3 to decide on the proposal on its own merits within eight weeks of receiving the order and to communicate the decision to the petitioner.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can direct an administrative authority to decide on a petitioner's proposal within a stipulated time
Subjects
- Writ Petition
- Administrative Law
- Direction
- High Court
- Maharashtra
- Decision on Proposal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:42604-DB
wp12359-26.doc
drp
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.12359 OF 2026
Sainath Ramesh Punde PETITIONER
VERSUS
The State of Maharashtra and Others RESPONDENTS
.......
Mr. Ramesh I. Wakade, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. B. B. Bhise, AGP for Respondent - State
....…
[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, &
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J. J.]
DATE : 15th SEPTEMBER, 2026
ORDER :
The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent
No.3 to take decision on the proposal of the Petitioner dated 11 th
March, 2026 on its own merits, within a period of 8 weeks from
the date of receipt of copy of this order and communicate the
decision to the Petitioner.
[ ABASAHEB D. SHINDE ] [ NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI ]
JUDGE JUDGE
drp/wp12359-26.doc
Checking your session…