Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

BALU BHAGWAN MULEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed Respondent No. 3 to decide the petitioner's representation within six weeks of receipt of the order.

Summary

Balu Bhagwan Mule filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, seeking a decision on his representation dated 13 August 2025, which the State of Maharashtra had not yet acted upon. The petitioner alleged undue delay contrary to the Court’s earlier orders and a Government Resolution dated 23 August 2023. The respondents, represented by the Attorney General, contended that no specific time‑frame had been imposed. The Court examined whether the State was bound to decide the representation promptly in light of its own directions and the resolution. It held that the State must act expeditiously and issued a directive to Respondent No. 3 to decide the representation within six weeks of receiving the order. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of by this direction.

Issues considered

  • Whether Respondent No. 3 is required to decide the petitioner's representation dated 13 August 2025 expeditiously, in accordance with the Court’s prior orders and the Government Resolution dated 23 August 2023.

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • representation
  • expeditious decision
  • government resolution
  • high court

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43965-DB


                                                   1                     63-WP-12404-26.odt


                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                   BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                              WRIT PETITION NO. 12404 OF 2026

                                     BALU BHAGWAN MULE
                                            VERSUS
                  THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND
                                            OTHERS
                                              ...
              Mr. Avinash D. Aghav, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondents/State
                                              ...

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                  ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                           DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2026

              PER COURT :

              .             The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent

              No.3    to   decide   the    representation   of   the   petitioner    dated

              13/08/2025 in the light of the orders passed by this Court and the

              Government Resolution dated 23/08/2023, as expeditiously as

              possible and in any case within a period of six weeks from the date

              of receipt of copy of this order.



                  (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)             (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              SVH


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.