Bombay High Court

VINOD SURESH PAWASEversusTHE TAHASILDAR VADGAON MAVAL AND ANR

Decided: 29 September 2026
Disposal: Allowed To be withdrawn

Holding

The petition was withdrawn and liberty was granted to file a properly worded petition on the same cause of action.

Summary

The petitioner, Mr. Vinod Suresh Pawase, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay. The Court observed that the petition did not conform to the prescribed drafting and presentation norms. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and to re‑file a properly worded petition on the same cause of action. The Court granted leave to withdraw and liberty to file a new petition. Consequently, the petition was disposed of as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether the petition as drafted conforms to the prescribed norms of drafting and presentation
Whether the petitioner may be granted liberty to withdraw the petition and re‑file a properly worded petition

Subjects

civil procedure
writ petition
withdrawal
drafting norms

Judgment

TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
Digitally signed by
TRUPTI SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2026.10.05
10:21:26 +0530



                             TSB                                              45-wp-12435-2026.doc

                                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                              CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                             WRIT PETITION NO. 12435 OF 2026


                      Mr. Vinod Suresh Pawase                              … Petitioner
                               V/s.
                      The Tahsildar, Vadgaon-Maval & Anr.                  … Respondents



                      Ms. Saroj N. Pagare for the Petitioner.

                      Dr. Dhruti M. Kapadia, AGP, for the Respondent -State.



                                                        CORAM :   A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                                  KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                           DATE : 29th September, 2026

                      P.C.:-

                      1)              In our view, the present Petition as drafted and presented

                      before this Court, does not conform to the prescribed norms of drafting and

                      presentation of a Petition. Faced with this difficulty, the learned Advocate

                      for the Petitioner seeks leave to withdraw Petition, with liberty to file a

                      properly worded Petition on the same cause of action.

                      1.1)            Leave and liberty granted.

                      2)              Disposed off as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty.


                                   (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                  (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

                                                                                                     1/1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.