Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

GANESH BHAGWAN BOYNEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed Respondent No.2 to decide the petitioner’s tribal claim within two months.

Summary

Ganesh Bhagwan Boyne, a student, filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the committee (Respondent No.2) to decide his pending tribal claim, which has been awaiting resolution since 23 July 2025. The petitioner required a validity certificate to continue his studies. The Court noted the petitioner’s educational needs and the undue delay in adjudicating the claim. It directed Respondent No.2 to decide the claim within two months from the date of the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the committee (Respondent No.2) should be directed to decide the petitioner’s pending tribal claim within a reasonable time

Subjects

  • tribal claim
  • validity certificate
  • writ petition
  • high court
  • direction
  • student

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43850-DB


                                                   1              905-wp 12452-2025.odt



                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                    BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                 WRIT PETITION NO. 12452 OF 2025

                 Ganesh Bhagwan Boyne                                        .. Petitioner

                        Versus

                 The State Of Maharashtra
                 Through Its Secretary And Others                            .. Respondents

                 Mr. Swapnil A. Deshmukh, Advocate for Petitioner.
                 Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 & 2.
                 Mr. M. D. Narwadkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.

                                          CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND
                                                  JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
                                          DATE         :   24th SEPTEMBER, 2026.

                 PER COURT :-

                 1.     Heard learned advocate for the petitioner, learned A.G.P. for

                 respondent/State and learned advocate for respondent No. 4. No

                 notice is required to respondent No. 3 looking to the nature of the

                 prayers.


                 2.     The petitioner’s tribe claim is pending with respondent No. 2

                 - committee since 23.07.2025. Therefore, a prayer is made that

                 the directions be given to respondent No. 2 to decide the claim of

                 the petitioner at the earliest.
                                  2             905-wp 12452-2025.odt


3.       Considering that the petitioner is a student who requires the

validity certificate for prosecuting his studies, we direct the

respondent No. 2 to decide the claim of the petitioner within two

(02) months from today.


4.       With this, the writ petition stands disposed of.



( JITENDRA JAIN, J.)                          ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. )




P.S.B.


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.