Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

RUKHMIN VITTHAL GAYSAMUDREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed Respondent No. 3 to decide the petitioner's representation in accordance with the 2007 Government Circular and this Court’s earlier orders.

Summary

The petitioner, Rukhmin Vitthal Gaysamudre, filed a writ petition challenging the handling of his representation dated 11 August 2023. The petitioner argued that the decision on his representation was not made in accordance with the Government Circular dated 9 March 2007 and prior orders of this Court. The State of Maharashtra, represented by Mrs. Saie Joshi, opposed the petition. The Bench, comprising Justices Nitin B. Suryawanshi and Abasahab D. Shinde, examined the statutory and judicial guidelines governing such representations. It held that the respondent authority must reconsider the representation in light of the circular and the Court’s earlier directives. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition by directing Respondent No. 3 to decide the representation within eight weeks of receiving the order.

Issues considered

  • What is the correct procedure for deciding the petitioner's representation dated 11‑08‑2023 in view of Government Circular dated 09‑03‑2007 and prior judicial orders?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • representation
  • government circular
  • high court
  • direction
  • administrative law

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44278-DB


                                                   {1}                  78-wp-12483-2026

                                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
                                            BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                     78 WRIT PETITION NO. 12483 OF 2026

                                    Rukhmin Vitthal Gaysamudre
                                              VERSUS
                                The State Of Maharashtra And Others
                                                  ...
              Mr. S.R. Kedar, Advocate for the Petitioner
              Mrs. Saie Joshi, AGP for State
                                                .......

                                          CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                                                  ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.


                                             DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2026
              PER COURT :

              1.       The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 3 to

              decide representation of the petitioners dated 11.08.2023, in the light

              of Government Circular dated 09.03.2007 and the orders passed by

              this Court from time to time, within a period of eight weeks from the

              date of receipt of copy of this order.



              (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                   (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




              Bhagyawant Punde


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.