Bombay High Court
ANIL GOVIND KAVADIKARversusCHANDRASHEKHAR G. ARU
- Decided
- Disposal
- Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Anil Govind Kavadikar, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court. No counsel appeared on the scheduled hearing date, and the court adjourned the matter as a final opportunity. On the adjourned date, the petitioner again failed to appear. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the court
Subjects
- writ petition
- non-prosecution
- dismissal
- procedural default
Judgment
10-WP-1249-2018.docx
rrpillai IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 1249 OF 2018
Anil Govind Kavadikar … Petitioner
Vs.
Chandrashekhar G. Aru … Respondent
None for the Petitioner.
CORAM : GAURI GODSE, J.
DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER 2026
ORDER :
1. Since none had appeared on the last date, the writ
petition was adjourned as a last chance.
2. Even today none appears for the petitioner.
3. The writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
[GAURI GODSE, J.]
Digitally
signed by
RAJESHWARI
RAJESHWARI RAMESH
RAMESH PILLAI
PILLAI Date:
2026.09.16 1/1
10:43:08
+0530
Checking your session…