Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHAIKH PASHU SHAIKH YASEEN AND ANOTHERversusTHE DIVISIONAL REGISTRAR CO OPERATIVE SOCIETIES CHH SAMBHAJINAGAR AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court held that the Respondent (Divisional Registrar) must decide the revision application on its merits within twelve weeks of receipt of the order.

Summary

Petitioners Shaikh Pashu Shaikh Yaseen and another filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Divisional Registrar of Cooperative Societies, Chh. Sambhajinagar, regarding their Revision Application No. 29 of 2025. The Court examined whether the Registrar should be compelled to decide the revision application on its merits. Finding no substantive hearing on the revision, the Court directed the Registrar to adjudicate the revision application within twelve weeks of receiving a copy of the order. No merits of the original petition were decided; the focus was on ensuring timely disposal of the pending revision. The petition was consequently disposed with the specified direction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Divisional Registrar should be directed to decide the pending Revision Application No. 29 of 2025 on its merits within a stipulated time

Subjects

  • Writ Petition
  • Revision Application
  • Cooperative Societies
  • Procedural Direction
  • Time Limit

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:44301-DB


                                                  *1*                   916-wp-12490-2026


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                916 WRIT PETITION NO. 12490 OF 2026

                            Shaikh Pashu Shaikh Yaseen And Another
                                             VERSUS
                       The Divisional Registrar Co Operative Societies Chh
                                   Sambhajinagar And Others
                                                ...
                Mr. Md Samiuddin M Y Choudhari, Advocate for the Petitioner
                Mr. S. K. Tambe, AGP for Respondents/State
                                                ...
                                   CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
                                             ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                   DATE : 24th SEPTEMBER 2026

                P. C. :-

                1.         Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No.1

                to decide the Revision Application No.29 of 2025 filed by the

                petitioner on its own merits, within a period of twelve (12)

                weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.




                (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)                (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)




                Narwade


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.