Bombay High Court
PRAGATI PRAFUL SHINGADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The cause of action accrued within the jurisdiction of the Principal Seat, so the petition must be pursued there.
Summary
Pragati Praful Shingade filed a writ petition (No. 12546 of 2026) in the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra. The petitioner contended that the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of the Principal Seat of the High Court, not the Aurangabad bench. The Court examined the locus of the cause of action and the appropriate forum for the petition. It concluded that the cause of action indeed accrued within the jurisdiction of the Principal Seat. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the Principal Seat for further relief.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable before the Aurangabad bench or should be filed before the Principal Seat of the High Court?
Subjects
- jurisdiction
- writ petition
- High Court
- principal seat
- forum selection
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:43033-DB
{1} 20-wp-12546-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
20 WRIT PETITION NO. 12546 OF 2026
Pragati Praful Shingade
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. S.R. Barlinge, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. N.D. Batule, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The cause of action is accrued to the petitioner within the
jurisdiction of Principal Seat.
2. Writ Petition is therefore disposed of by granting liberty to the
Petitioner to approach the Principal Seat.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…