Bombay High Court
CHETAN ARJUN SHEJWALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court directed the Education Officer to decide the petitioner’s representation in light of its earlier judgments within six weeks.
Summary
The petitioner, Chetan Arjun Shejwal, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking relief against the State of Maharashtra and others. The petition raised the question of whether the Education Officer should consider the petitioner’s representation dated 10 August 2026. The Court examined the applicability of its earlier rulings in Writ Petition Nos. 7357 of 2023, 1457 of 2026 and 4852 of 2026. Relying on those precedents, the Court concluded that the Education Officer must decide the representation in accordance with the earlier decisions. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Education Officer to make a decision within six weeks of receiving a copy of the order.
Issues considered
- What procedural direction should be given to the Education Officer regarding the petitioner’s representation dated 10‑08‑2026?
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- education officer
- procedural direction
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44279-DB
{1} 25-wp-12577-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
25 WRIT PETITION NO. 12577 OF 2026
Chetan Arjun Shejwal
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
...
Mr. Ketan Pote, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. S.K. Tambe, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 23rd SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No.
3/Education Officer to decide the representation of the petitioner dated
10.08.2026, in the light of decision of this Court in Writ Petition Nos.
7357 of 2023, 1457 of 2026, 4852 of 2026, within a period of six
weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…