Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

TUSHAR K KHANDEversusUNION OF INDIA THE GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY AND ROS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed off as Withdrawn

Holding

The High Court held that it will not entertain the writ petition for interim relief as the CAT had already rejected the prayer, and the petitioner may raise all grounds before the Tribunal, leading to dismissal of the petition.

Summary

Petitioner Tushar K Khande filed a writ petition seeking a writ of certiorari to quash a Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) order that rejected his request for interim relief against a transfer order dated 28 August 2026, and to stay the transfer and maintain his posting in Mumbai. The High Court observed that the interim relief had already been denied by the CAT and that the petitioner had reported to the new posting under protest. The Court held that the petitioner could raise all his grounds before the CAT at the scheduled hearing on 22 October 2026 and that the Court would not entertain the writ petition for interim relief. No merits of the transfer were decided. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court should grant interim relief (stay of the transfer order) despite the CAT's prior rejection of such relief
  • Whether the writ petition seeking certiorari to quash the CAT's order is maintainable
  • Whether the petitioner’s posting can be maintained pending the final hearing before the CAT

Subjects

  • transfer order
  • interim relief
  • writ petition
  • certiorari
  • Central Administrative Tribunal
  • status quo
  • public service employment

Judgment

           Digitally signed
           by MAYUR
MAYUR    KONDIRAM
KONDIRAM ADANE
ADANE    Date:
         2026.09.29
           14:08:48 +0530
                                                                                             39-WP-12577-2026 (C).doc

    Mayur
                                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                                CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION


                                               WRIT PETITION NO. 12577 OF 2026

                              Tushar K Khande                                              ...Petitioner
                                   Versus
                              Union Of India The General
                              Manager Central Railway And Ors                              ...Respondents
                                                                     ...
                              Adv. Vicky Nagrani, for the Petitioner.
                              Adv. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
                                                                     ...


                                             CORAM : MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, CJ. &
                                                     ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.

                                                DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026.


                              P.C.:
                              1.      The instant writ petition, inter alia, is filed for the following

                              substantive reliefs :-

                                            “a. call for the records and proceedings of Original
                                            Application No.714 of 2026 from the learned Central
                                            Administrative Tribunal, Mumbai, and after examining the
                                            legality and propriety thereof, be pleased to issue a writ of
                                            certiorari, or a writ in the nature of certiorari, or any other
                                            appropriate writ, order or direction, thereby quashing and
                                            setting aside the judgment and order dated 10.09.2026
                                            passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal,
                                            Mumbai in Original Application No.714 of 2026;
                                            b. pending the hearing and final disposal of the present
                                            Petition and/or Original Application No.714 of 2026, be
                                            pleased to stay the operation, implementation and execution
                                            of the transfer order dated 28.08.2026 insofar as it concerns
                                            the Petitioner;



                                                                     1/3
                                                              39-WP-12577-2026 (C).doc


             c. pending the hearing and final disposal of the present
             Petition and/or Original Application No.714 of 2026, be
             pleased to direct the Respondents not to relieve the Petitioner
             from Mumbai Division and to permit him to continue as Law
             Officer at Mumbai;
             d. In the alternative, be pleased to direct the Respondents to
             maintain status quo with regard to the Petitioner's posting at
             Mumbai until the final adjudication of Original Application
             No.714 of 2026.”



2.   After   substantial      arguments,        we    have     expressed        our

disinclination to entertain the instant Writ Petition in view of the

fact that the Petitioner's prayer for interim relief in terms of staying

the effect and operation of the Impugned Transfer Order dated 28 th

August 2026 was rejected by the Central Administrative Tribunal,

Mumbai, (“Tribunal” for short) vide order dated 10 th                 September

2026.

3.   At this stage, Mr. Vicky Nagrani, learned counsel for the

Petitioner fairly submits that the Petitioner has already reported to

the transferred place of posting under protest, and the Original

Application No. 714 of 2026 is scheduled to be listed on 22 nd

October 2026, before the Tribunal.

4.   Accordingly, he prays for liberty to raise all the grounds before

the Tribunal as have been raised before this Court.

5.   Suffice it to observe that it shall be open to the Petitioner to

raise all grounds raised before the Tribunal at the stage of final

hearing of the Original Application No.714 of 2026 on 22 nd October


                                      2/3
                                                    39-WP-12577-2026 (C).doc


2026. The Tribunal is requested to endeavor to decide the Original

Application No. 714 of 2026 expeditiously depending on its roster.

6.     It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion

on the merits of the matter.

7.     With the aforesaid leave, the instant Writ Petition stands

dismissed.



     [ADVAIT M. SETHNA, J.]                    [CHIEF JUSTICE]




                                 3/3


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.