Bombay High Court
TANVI RAJIV KALASKARversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The High Court held that the petitioner must first avail the alternative remedy of approaching the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
Summary
Tanvi Rajiv Kalaskar filed a writ petition (23 WRIT PETITION NO. 12591 OF 2026) before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging an action of the State of Maharashtra and another party. The petitioner, represented by Advocate C.K. Shinde, sought relief from the High Court. The Court examined whether the petitioner could directly approach the High Court or was required to first approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. In the absence of detailed factual findings, the Court concluded that the appropriate forum for the grievance was the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed, granting the petitioner liberty to avail the alternative remedy before the Tribunal.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is required to approach the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal before filing a writ petition in the High Court
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative law
- jurisdiction
- alternative remedy
- Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:43032-DB
{1} 23-wp-12591-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
23 WRIT PETITION NO. 12591 OF 2026
Tanvi Rajiv Kalaskar
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
...
Mr. C.K. Shinde, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr S.K. Tambe, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 21st SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
. Writ Petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail
alternate remedy of approaching Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…