Bombay High Court
AMAR CHINTAMAN KINIversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. COMMISSIONER VASAI VIRAR CORPORATION AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The Court refused to grant mandamus and disposed of the petition, directing the corporation to consider any representation within eight weeks.
Summary
Amar Chintaman Kini filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Maharashtra and the Municipal Corporation to cancel a Commencement Certificate issued to Siddharth Co‑operative Housing Society. The petitioner did not appear before the Court. The Court declined to grant the drastic relief, noting that the petitioner could first file a representation with the Corporation. It directed the Corporation to consider any such representation within eight weeks and to afford a hearing to those likely to be affected. No merits of the underlying dispute were examined. Consequently, the petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to cancel a Commencement Certificate issued by a municipal corporation
- Whether the petitioner has the requisite locus standi to seek such relief
- Whether the petitioner must first approach the corporation with a representation before invoking judicial intervention
Subjects
- mandamus
- commencement certificate
- municipal corporation
- representation
- writ petition
- procedural law
Judgment
37-WP-12593-2025.doc
PURTI IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
PRASAD
PARAB CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
Digitally signed by
PURTI PRASAD
PARAB
Date: 2026.09.03
18:05:11 +0530
WRIT PETITION NO. 12593 OF 2025
Amar Chintaman Kini … Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and Ors. ... Respondents
__________________________
None for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.I. Patel, Addl. G.P. a/w Ms. R.A. Salunkhe, AGP for Respondent –
State.
__________________________
CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND
SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.
DATED : 1st SEPTEMBER, 2026.
P.C. :
1. None appeared for the Petitioner when the matter was called
out. The Petitioner is seeking a relief of Mandamus for directing the
Respondents to cancel the Commencement Certificate issued by the
Respondent - Municipal Corporation to the Respondent - Siddharth
Co.operative Housing Society. We are not inclined to grant this drastic
relief to the Petitioner at this stage. Be it as it is, the Petition was filed in
the year 2025. If at all the Petitioner has got any grievances, the Petitioner
is at liberty to file a proper representation to the Corporation. If such
representation is filed, the Corporation to decide the representation of the
Petitioner on its own merits. It is made clear that we have not gone into
the merits of the matter and all contentions of all the parties are left open.
Purti Parab 1/2
37-WP-12593-2025.doc
2. If such a representation is filed, the Corporation is directed to
decide such a representation made, if any, within a period of eight weeks
from the date of making some representation. Needless to say, the
Corporation should grant adequate opportunity to the persons who are
likely to be affected by any order likely to be passed in the proceedings
before the Corporation.
3. With the aforesaid observation, the Petition is disposed of.
(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.) (M. S. KARNIK, J.)
Purti Parab 2/2
Checking your session…