Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

PROPOSED NATHKRUPA VIVIDH KARYAKARI SEVA SAHAKARI SANSTHA MARYADIT BELWANDI BKversusTHE HONBLE MINISTER DEPARTMENT OF CO OPERATION AND ANOTHER

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directs the respondent to decide the revision petition on its merits within four months of receipt of the order.

Summary

The petitioner, Proposed Nathkrupa Vividh Karyakari Seva Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit Belwadi, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the Minister of Cooperation regarding a revision petition filed on 12 March 2024. The petition sought a directive for the respondent to consider the revision on its merits. The High Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to decide the revision within a reasonable time and after hearing the parties. No substantive reasoning on the merits of the revision was provided, as the court focused on procedural compliance. Consequently, the court disposed of the writ petition, ordering the respondent to decide the revision petition on its merits within four months of receiving the order, after affording a hearing to the contesting parties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the respondent, the Minister of Cooperation, must decide the revision petition filed by the petitioner on its merits within a stipulated time and after hearing the parties

Subjects

  • revision petition
  • cooperative society
  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • direction to decide
  • time limit

Judgment

                          1                         950 wp 12595.26

    IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
               BENCH AT AURANGABAD

               WRIT PETITION NO. 12595 OF 2026

      Proposed nathkrupa Vividh Karyakari
      Seva Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit Belwadi
      (Bk)                                  ..      Petitioner

               Versus

      The Hon’ble Minister Department of
      Cooperation and another                  ..   Respondents

Shri K. R. Choudhari, Advocate h/f Shri S. B. Solanke and Shri
B. T. Bodkhe, Advocates for the Petitioner.
Shri S. R. Wakale, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.

                   CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
                           ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                    DATE : 24TH SEPTEMBER, 2026.

ORDER :


.     The writ petition is disposed of by directing the respondent
No. 1 to decide revision filed by the petitioner on 12.03.2024, on
its own merits, within a period of four (04) months from the date
of receipt of copy of this order and after giving opportunity of
hearing to the contesting parties.



[ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.]             [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]



bsb/Sept. 26


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.