Bombay High Court
ANIKET SURESH JADHAV AND ORSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU. SECRETARY AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is allowed to the extent of the three petitioners who obtained relief from the Supreme Court.
Summary
Eleven petitioners filed a writ petition challenging the selection process for appointments. During the pendency, eight petitioners had already been selected, while the remaining three – Pratikraj Rajendrakumar Hamand, Sneha Hanamant Bhand and Vidya Dipak Pawar – obtained relief from the Supreme Court in Civil Appeal Nos. 011271‑011272/2026. By mutual consent, the Bombay High Court allowed the petition only to the extent of these three petitioners, recognizing their successful Supreme Court orders. The court thereby limited the relief to the three petitioners who were placed at serial numbers 112, 113 and 114 in the merit list. No further orders were made regarding the other eight petitioners.
Issues considered
- What relief, if any, is available to the petitioners who were not selected before the Supreme Court judgment?
- Whether the writ petition can be allowed partially to the three petitioners who obtained a Supreme Court order?
Subjects
- selection process
- merit list
- writ petition
- Supreme Court order
- partial relief
- appointment
Judgment
TRUPTI
SADANAND
BAMNE
Digitally signed by
1 921-wp-12596-2025.odt
TRUPTI SADANAND
BAMNE
Date: 2026.08.28
17:03:42 +0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12596 OF 2025
Adv. Aniket Suresh Jadhav & Ors. … Petitioners
versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. … Respondents
……
Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni with Mr.Prathamesh Deshpande i/b. Mr.Prajakt
Arjunwadkar for the Petitioners.
Mrs.Neha S. Bhide, Government Pleader with Mr.B.V.Samant, Addl.GP,
Mr.O.A.Chandurkar, Addl.GP and Mrs.Pooja C. Patil, AGP for the
Respondent -State.
Mr.Ashutosh M. Kulkarni with Mr.Hrutik R. Chavan for the Respondent
– MPSC.
Dr.Milind Sathe, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr. Rahul Nerlekar for the
Respondent, the Bombay High Court.
…...
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, ACJ
&
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.
DATE : 27 AUGUST, 2026
P.C.:
1. This Petition is filed by eleven Petitioners. During the
pendency of this Petition, eight have already been selected and
Trupti S. Bamne
2 921-wp-12596-2025.odt
appointed. The remaining three, namely, Pratikraj Rajendrakumar
Hamand, Sneha Hanamant Bhand and Vidya Dipak Pawar, have
succeeded before the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated
19.08.2026 passed in Pratikraj Rajendrakumar Hamand & Ors. Versus
Nikita Deepakrao More & Ors.1 These three are at Serial Nos. 112, 113
and 114, respectively, in the merit list.
2. By consent of the parties, since these three candidates have
also succeeded, the Petition is allowed to the extent of these three
Petitioners.
(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)
1 Civil Appeal No. 011271-011272/2026
Trupti S. Bamne
Checking your session…