Bombay High Court
SANTOSH RAOSAHEB NIKHADEversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE OF LAND RECORD AND ANR
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that the respondent must decide the petitioner's representation on its merits within eight weeks of receipt of the order.
Summary
The petitioner, Santosh Raosaheb Nikhade, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra regarding his representation dated 11 April 2025. The petitioner sought a judicial directive compelling the respondent to consider his representation. The High Court examined whether it could order the respondent to decide the representation on its merits within a stipulated time. The Court found no impediment to issuing such a direction and ordered the respondent to decide the representation within eight weeks of receiving the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with the directive to the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can direct the respondent to decide the petitioner's representation dated 11 April 2025 on its merits within a specified time frame
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative decision
- high court direction
- time limit
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:44321-DB
{1} 64-wp-12662-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
64 WRIT PETITION NO. 12662 OF 2026
Santosh Raosaheb Nikhade
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra And Another
...
Mr. D.S. Patil, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr. N.D Batule, AGP for State
.......
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 28th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2 to
decide representation of the petitioner dated 11.04.2025, on its own
merits, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy
of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…