Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

LINGESHWAR SIDDHESHWARAPPA KHURPEversusSUREKHA LINGEWHAR KHURPE

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn in accordance with the petitioner's request.

Summary

The petitioner, Lingeshwar Siddheshwarappa Khurpe, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench. The petitioner later instructed his counsel to withdraw the petition. The learned advocate submitted the written instructions to the court seeking withdrawal. The court considered the request and, noting the petitioner's desire to discontinue the proceedings, dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined as the case was closed upon the petitioner's request.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court may dismiss a writ petition upon the petitioner's request for withdrawal

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                    1                           902wp12665.25.odt

             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                        BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                  902 WRIT PETITION NO. 12665 OF 2025

             LINGESHWAR SIDDHESHWARAPPA KHURPE
                                  VERSUS
                    SUREKHA LINGEWHAR KHURPE
                                     ...
      Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bhavthankar Vivek Vasantrao
         Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Sharad S. Solanke
                                     …

                          CORAM : MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J.

                          DATE      : 30.09.2026


PER COURT :

1.            The learned Advocate for the petitioner placed on record the

written instructions received from the petitioner requesting him to

withdraw the Writ Petition, hence he is seeking withdrawal of the Writ

Petition.



2.            The Writ Petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.



3.            The communication addressed to the learned advocate for

the petitioner is taken on record and marked as “X” for the purpose of

identification.



                                    ( MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J. )




Mahajansb/


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.