Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SATYAKAAM FOUNDATIONversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition on 1st December 2020 but failed to appear for the hearing and did not take any steps to circulate the petition thereafter. The court observed that the petitioner showed no interest in pursuing the matter. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear or act on the petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • court procedure

Judgment

                 ssm                                                     93-wp1270.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 1270 OF 2021

            Satyakaam Foundation                                   …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The State Of Maharashtra & Ors.                        …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Smt. Madhavi H. Mhatre APP, for the Respondent-State.
                              ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            1st December, 2020, neither the Petitioner nor its Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)

          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                           1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:08 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.