Bombay High Court
PRAKASH NIVRUTTI YACHAWADversusTHE DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR LATUR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
A writ petition is not maintainable where an alternate remedy, like an election petition, is available.
Summary
Petitioner Prakash Nivrutti Yachwad filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging actions of the Divisional Joint Registrar, Latur and other respondents. The petition sought relief without specifying the exact nature of the grievance. The Court examined whether the writ petition could be entertained when the petitioner had an alternative statutory remedy, namely filing an election petition. Noting the existence of this alternate remedy, the Court held that it was not appropriate to proceed with the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of, with the Court granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the election petition as an alternative remedy.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an alternate remedy, such as an election petition, is available
Subjects
- writ petition
- alternate remedy
- election petition
- maintainability
- high court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:43350-DB
1 911 wp 12737.26
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 12737 OF 2026
Prakash Nivrutti Yachwad .. Petitioner
Versus
The Divisional Joint Registrar,
Latur and others .. Respondents
Shri Umakant B. Deshmukh, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Shri S. K. Kadam, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 1 and 4.
Ms. S. S. Joshi, A.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 22ND SEPTEMBER, 2026.
ORDER :
. In view of alternate remedy of filing election petition, we
are not inclined to entertain the writ petition. Writ petition is
therefore disposed of with liberty to avail the alternate remedy.
[ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.] [NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.]
bsb/Sept. 26
Checking your session…