Bombay High Court
VAISHALI VIVEK PADKANTWARversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is held to be infructuous and is disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Vaishali Vivek Padkantwar, filed a writ petition against the District Collector and other respondents. The petitioner’s counsel later submitted that the petition had become infructuous due to the passage of time. The Court considered the submission and found no merit in continuing the proceedings. Consequently, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous. No substantive issues of law or fact were adjudicated beyond the procedural disposal.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition had become infructuous due to lapse of time
Subjects
- infructuous petition
- writ petition
- procedural disposal
- public law
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:38021
1
909-wp-12749-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 12749 OF 2023
Vaishali Vivek Padkantwar
VERSUS
The District Collector And Others
...
Mr. N. B. Bhosale h/f Mr. M. V. Salunke, Advocate for the
Petitioner
Mr. B. V. Virdhe, AGP for Respondent-State
Mr. D. S. Bhapkar h/f Mr. N. B. Garje, Advocate for
Respondent no.3
Mr. J. S. Kadam h/f Mr. U. B. Deshmukh, Advocate for
Respondent no.9
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 21ST AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :-
. Mr. N. B. Bhosale h/f Mr. M. V. Salunke, learned
Advocate for the petitioner submits that by passage of time,
the petition has turned infructuous.
2. In view of the above statement, Writ Petition stands
disposed of as infructuous.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…