Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

THE KALYAN KRUSHI UTPANNA BAZAR SAMITEEversusSANDIP BANSI WALUNJ AND ORS.

Decided
Disposal
Rule Made Absolute

Holding

The court ordered the insertion of the words “Appeal No.17 of 2016” in the specified paragraphs and directed that the original judgment be modified accordingly.

Summary

Two writ petitions (Nos. 12969/2016 and 12755/2016) were filed by The Kalyan Krushi Utpanna Bazar Samitee against various respondents. The petitioners sought correction of the earlier judgments dated 20 August 2026. The Court examined the request and found no substantive dispute, only a procedural amendment was required. Accordingly, the Court ordered that the words “Appeal No.17 of 2016” be inserted after “Appeal No.16 of 2016” in paragraphs 33(ii) and 33(iii). The remaining portions of the original orders were left untouched, and the modified judgments were to be uploaded as Judgment No.1 in both matters.

Issues considered

  • Whether the judgment dated 20 August 2026 should be corrected by inserting the specified words

Subjects

  • judgment correction
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • writ petition
  • procedural amendment

Judgment

                                                                         p1-wp12969-2016-speaking.doc


                      AGK
                               IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 12969 OF 2016

ATUL                  The Kalyan Krushi Utpanna
GANESH                Bazar Samitee                                    … Petitioner
KULKARNI
                                 V/s.
Digitally signed by
ATUL GANESH
KULKARNI              1a. Kusum Kurhade & Ors.                         … Respondents
Date: 2026.08.28
14:14:19 +0530


                                       WRIT PETITION NO. 12755 OF 2016

                      The Kalyan Krushi Utpanna
                      Bazar Samitee                                    … Petitioner
                                 V/s.
                      Sandip Bansi Walunj & Ors.                       … Respondents

                      Mr. Kirit Hakani for the Petitioner.


                                                   CORAM      : AMIT BORKAR, J.

                                                   DATED      : AUGUST 28, 2026
                      P.C.:

                      1.      Not on board. Upon mentioning, taken on board for speaking
                      to the minutes of the Judgment dated 20 August 2026.

                      2.      In paragraphs 33(ii) and 33(iii), after the words “Appeal
                      No.16 of 2016”, words “Appeal No.17 of 2016” be inserted.

                      3.      Remaining order shall remain as it is.

                      4.      Original Judgment be modified and upload the same as
                      Judgment No.1 in both the matters.


                                                                       (AMIT BORKAR, J.)




                                                         1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.