Bombay High Court

SAIF ALI NOOR ALIversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

Disposal: DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Education Officer must decide the petitioner's proposal within twelve weeks, considering the decisions in Writ Petition Nos.7357/2023 and 1457/2026.

Summary

Saif Ali Noor Ali filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Education Officer regarding a proposal submitted on 27 August 2026. The petitioner sought a directive for the Education Officer to decide the proposal. The Court examined whether it could impose a specific time‑frame on an administrative authority and considered its earlier decisions in Writ Petition Nos.7357/2023 and 1457/2026. The Court held that the Education Officer must decide the proposal within twelve weeks of receiving the order, taking into account the precedent judgments. Accordingly, the petition was disposed of with the direction to the Education Officer.

Issues considered

Whether the Education Officer is required to decide the petitioner's proposal within a reasonable time.
Whether the Court can prescribe a specific twelve‑week period for the administrative decision, in light of prior judgments.

Subjects

writ petition
administrative law
education officer
direction
time‑frame
precedent

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43935-DB


                                                   *1*                      12777.2026WP.


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO.12777 OF 2026

                                            SAIF ALI NOOR ALI
                                                 VERSUS
                             THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
                                                    …..
                            Shri. Girish L. Awale, Advocate for the Petitioner
                           Shri. V. M. Kagne, AGP for the Respondent – State.
                                                    …..

                                      CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
                                              ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                      DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026

                P. C. :-

                .          The matter is not on Board. Upon mentioning, the same is
                taken on Board.


                2.         The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
                No.3 – Education Officer to decide the proposal of the petitioner
                dated 27.08.2026, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from
                the date of receipt of copy of this order, by taking into
                consideration the decision of this Court in Writ Petition
                Nos.7357/2023 and 1457/2026.




                (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)              (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


                GGP

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…