Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MUKESH KAILASH KOCHUREversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

Disposal
DISPOSED OFF

Holding

The Court directed the Education Officer to decide the petitioner's proposal within twelve weeks, taking into account the decisions in Writ Petition Nos.7357/2023 and 1457/2026.

Summary

Mukesh Kailash Kochure filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the inaction of the Education Officer regarding a proposal submitted on 09 September 2026. The petition sought judicial intervention to compel a decision on the proposal. The Court, after noting that the matter was not on the board, took the petition on board. It directed the Education Officer (Respondent No.3) to decide the proposal within twelve weeks of receiving a copy of the order. The Court further instructed that the decision must be made in accordance with the principles laid down in earlier writ petitions numbered 7357/2023 and 1457/2026. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of with the specified direction.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Education Officer should be directed to decide the petitioner's proposal within a specified time frame.
  • Whether the decision of the Education Officer must be guided by the precedents set in Writ Petition Nos.7357/2023 and 1457/2026.

Subjects

  • Writ petition
  • Education Officer
  • Administrative law
  • Time limit
  • Judicial direction

Judgment

2026:BHC-AUG:43932-DB


                                                    *1*                       12782.2026wp.


                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                       BENCH AT AURANGABAD

                                  WRIT PETITION NO.12782 OF 2026

                                      MUKESH KAILASH KOCHURE
                                                 VERSUS
                                    THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
                                  THR. ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS
                                                     …..
                            Shri. Girish L. Awale, Advocate for the Petitioner
                           Shri. A. B. GIrase, G.P. for the Respondent – State.
                                                     …..

                                       CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI &
                                               ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
                                       DATE : 22nd SEPTEMBER 2026

                P. C. :-

                .          The matter is not on Board. Upon mentioning, the same is
                taken on Board.


                2.         The writ petition is disposed of by directing respondent
                No.3 – Education Officer to decide the proposal of the petitioner
                dated 09.09.2026, within a period of twelve (12) weeks from
                the date of receipt of copy of this order, by taking into
                consideration the decision of this Court in Writ Petition
                Nos.7357/2023 and 1457/2026.




                (ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.)               (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)


                GGP


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.