Bombay High Court
RAMCHANDRA MADHAVRAO MUNDHEversusVIJAYMALA RAOSAHEB UPASE AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The writ petition is infructuous and is therefore disposed of.
Summary
The petitioner, Ramchandra Madhavrao Mundhe, filed a writ petition before the High Court of Bombay, Aurangabad Bench. During the pendency of this petition, the related regular civil suit (No. 121 of 2022) was disposed of by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Mukhed. The petitioner submitted that, with the disposal of the civil suit, there was nothing left to be claimed in the writ petition. The Court examined whether the writ petition could continue in view of the complete resolution of the underlying suit. Finding that no relief remained, the Court held the writ petition to be infructuous and ordered its disposal.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate disposition of a writ petition when the underlying civil suit has been fully disposed and no relief remains?
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- civil suit disposal
- jurisdiction
- High Court
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39765
1
2-wp-12848-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 12848 OF 2023
Ramchandra Madhavrao Mundhe
VERSUS
Vijaymala Raosaheb Upase And Others
...
Mr. P. S. Mantri h/f Mr. P. V. Barde, Advocate for the
Petitioner
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 31ST AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :-
. Mr. P. S. Mantri h/f Mr. P. V. Barde, learned Advocate
for the petitioner submits that during pendency of the present
Writ Petition, the Regular Civil Suit No.121 of 2022 is
disposed of by learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division,
Mukhed and nothing survives in this Writ Petition.
2. In view of the above, Writ Petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…