Bombay High Court
BAL SHIKSHAN PRASARAKMANDAL THROUGH SOPANRAO BEGAJI PATIL NADRE AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
Respondent No.1 must decide the petitioners' proposal within eight weeks of receiving the order.
Summary
Bal Shikshan Prasarakmandal, through its President, filed a writ petition challenging the inaction of the State of Maharashtra (Respondent No.1) in deciding a proposal forwarded by another government department (Respondent No.2) on 25 September 2024. The petition sought a judicial direction compelling the State to act on the proposal. The High Court examined whether the State had a duty to consider the proposal within a reasonable time. Finding no substantive objection to the petitioner's request, the Court ordered Respondent No.1 to decide the proposal within eight weeks of receiving a copy of the order. The petition was consequently disposed.
Issues considered
- What duty, if any, does the State of Maharashtra have to decide the proposal forwarded by Respondent No.2?
- Whether the Court can issue a mandatory time‑bound direction to the State to decide the proposal.
Subjects
- writ petition
- administrative law
- direction
- proposal
- state compliance
- time‑bound order
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:45870-DB
{1} 23-WP-12857-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
23 WRIT PETITION NO. 12857 OF 2026
Bal Shikshan Prasarakmandal Through its President Sopanrao Begaji
Patil Nadre And Another
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mr. Sambhaji S. Tope, Advocate for the Petitioners
Mr. N.D. Batule, AGP for the State
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 1 to
decide proposal of the petitioners forwarded by Respondent No. 2 on
25.09.2024 within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of
copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…