Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

SHABANA SAFRI @ SHABANA ALI KHANversusTHE SENIOR INSPECTOR OF POLICE, AMBOLI POLICE STATION, MUMBAI AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Dissmiss For Default/Non-Prosecution

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

Shabana Safri filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court against the Senior Inspector of Police, Amboli Police Station. The petitioner failed to appear for the hearing and, according to the record, made no effort to circulate the petition after filing it on 10 December 2020. The court observed that the petitioner appeared uninterested in pursuing the case. Consequently, the petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be proceeded with when the petitioner fails to appear and does not prosecute the petition?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • criminal appellate jurisdiction
  • petitioner's non‑appearance

Judgment

                 ssm                                                     95-wp1291.2021.doc

                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

                                 CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                   WRIT PETITION NO. 1291 OF 2021

            Shabana Safri @ Shabana Ali Khan                             …..Petitioner

                     Vs.

            The Senior Inspector Of Police,
            Amboli Police Station, Mumbai & Ors.                         …..Respondents

                                ____________________________________

            None for the Petitioner.
            Shri. Ashish I. Satpute APP, for the Respondent-State.
                               ____________________________________

                                               CORAM :      A. S. GADKARI AND
                                                            KAMAL KHATA, JJ.
                                                 DATE :     29th AUGUST, 2026.


            P.C.:-

            1)             None for the Petitioner when called out for hearing.

            2)             Record indicates that, since the date of filing of the Petition i.e.

            10th December, 2020, neither the Petitioner nor her Advocate has taken any

            steps to circulate the Petition, even once.

            2.1)           It appears that, the Petitioner is not interested in pursuing the

            Petition.

            3)             Dismissed for non-prosecution.



                       (KAMAL KHATA, J.)                          (A.S. GADKARI, J.)
          Digitally signed
          by SANJIV
SANJIV    SHARNAPPA
SHARNAPPA MASHALKAR                                                                           1/1
MASHALKAR Date:
          2026.09.07
          17:01:04 +0530


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.