Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Bombay High Court

MAYUR S/O MAROTI AKULWARversusSTATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY MEDICAL EDUCATION AND ORS

Decided
Disposal
Disposed Off

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner may be allowed to withdraw the writ petition and granted leave accordingly.

Summary

The petitioner, Mayur, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay seeking relief. He later approached the Court requesting permission to withdraw the petition so that he could pursue appropriate proceedings elsewhere. The primary issue before the Court was whether leave could be granted to withdraw a pending writ petition. The Court examined the procedural rule that a petition may be withdrawn with the Court's permission and found no impediment to allowing the withdrawal. Consequently, the Court granted leave to withdraw and ordered the petition to be disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition pending before the High Court

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ petition
  • civil appellate jurisdiction
  • leave to withdraw
  • High Court of Bombay
  • petition disposed

Judgment

                                                                   1                     909-wp-12915-
                                                                                              2026.doc

                                   IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                                           CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                                         WRIT PETITION NO. 12915 OF 2026

                    Mayur S/o. Maroti Akulwar                                    ...Petitioner
                             Vs.
                    The State of Maharashtra through its Secretary
                    Medical Education and Drugs Department and Another ...Respondents

                                                      -----------------

                    Mr. Yashraj Joshi, for the Petitioner.
                    Ms. Meghna Gowalani, for Respondent No.2 / CET Cell.
                    Smt. V. S. Nimbalkar, AGP, for the Respondent / State.
                                                      -----------------


                                                     CORAM :           R. I. CHAGLA AND
                                                                       FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ.
        Digitally
        signed by
        MAMTA
MAMTA AMAR
AMAR KALE
KALE
                                                     DATED        : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026
      Date:
      2026.09.30
        19:12:31
        +0530




                    P.C.:-

                    1.             The learned Counsel for the Petitioner has sought leave to

                    withdraw the petition in order to take out appropriate proceedings.

                    Accordingly, leave is granted.

                    2.             Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn, with liberty as

                    prayed.



                         [FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.]                              [R.I. CHAGLA, J.]



                     Mamta Kale                                                                    1/1


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.