Bombay High Court
SOMNATH KARBHARI DHOBALE AND OTHERSversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The Court held that Respondent No.2 must decide the petitioners' representation on its merits within six weeks.
Summary
The petitioners, Somnath Karbhari Dhobale and others, filed a writ petition challenging the failure of Respondent No.2 to decide their representation dated 10 May 2024. The High Court examined whether the respondent was obligated to consider the representation on its merits. The Court found no substantive hearing had been conducted and directed the respondent to decide the representation on its own merits. It ordered that this decision be made within six weeks of the order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with a directive to the respondent.
Issues considered
- Whether Respondent No.2 is required to decide the petitioners' representation dated 10 May 2024 on its merits
Subjects
- writ petition
- representation
- administrative decision
- High Court
- order to decide on merits
- procedural compliance
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:45874-DB
{1} 3-WP-12916-2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
3 WRIT PETITION NO. 12916 OF 2026
Somnath Karbhari Dhobale And Others
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra And Others
Mr. Shubham Jayabhar h/f Mr. D.R. Jayabhar, Advocate for the
Petitioners
Mr. B.B. Bhise, AGP for State
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND
ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, JJ.
DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. The Writ Petition is disposed of by directing Respondent No. 2 to
decide representation of the Petitioners dated 10.05.2024, on its own
merits, within a period of six weeks from the date of copy of this order.
(ABASAHEB D. SHINDE, J.) (NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.)
Bhagyawant Punde
Checking your session…