Bombay High Court

WARIVO OVERSEASversusUNION OF INDIA THR THE SECURTY AND ORS

Decided: 30 September 2026
Disposal: Disposed Off

Holding

The writ petition is allowed, and Respondent No.2 is directed to decide the amendment application within one week.

Summary

M/s. Warivo Overseas filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the refusal of the Union of India and its agencies to amend its Import General Manifest. The petitioner sought an order directing Respondent No.2 to decide its application dated 27 July 2026 for amendment of the manifest within a week. The Court examined the petition and the accompanying memorandum and found no impediment to granting the relief. Accordingly, the Court allowed the writ petition and directed Respondent No.2 to decide the application expeditiously, within one week of the order. The petition was thereafter disposed.

Issues considered

Whether the High Court should direct the Respondent to decide the petitioner's application for amendment of the Import General Manifest within a stipulated time.

Subjects

import
customs
manifest amendment
writ petition
administrative law

Judgment

                Digitally signed
                by ARUNA
      ARUNA     SANDEEP
      SANDEEP   TALWALKAR
      TALWALKAR Date:
                2026.09.30
                18:37:26 +0530                               506.WP12961.2026.odt



             IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
                     CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

                            WRIT PETITION NO.12961 OF 2026
M/s. Warivo Overseas.                                  … Petitioner
     Versus
Union of India and Ors.                                … Respondents
                            --------------
Mr. Brijesh Pathak, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra a/w. Ms. Sangeeta Yadav, Advocate for
Respondents.
                            --------------
                             CORAM : M. S. KARNIK &
                                           SANDESH D. PATIL, JJ.

                                         DATE :   30th SEPTEMBER, 2026
P.C. :
1.             Not on board. Upon production taken on board.

2.             We have heard Mr. Pathak, learned Counsel for the

Petitioner and Mr. Mishra, learned Counsel for the Respondents.

3.             We have gone through the memo of the Petition. Writ

Petition is allowed. The Respondent No. 2 is directed to decide the

Petitioners’ Application dated 27/7/2026 at Exh. H for amendment

of Import General Manifest, as mentioned in prayer clause (a), as

expeditiously as possible, in any case within a period of one week

from the date of communication of this order. Petition is disposed

of.


(SANDESH D. PATIL, J.)                               (M. S. KARNIK, J.)

Talwalkar                               1

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.