Bombay High Court
SHAIKH RAHIN AFZALversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER AND ORS
- Decided
- Disposal
- Disposed Off
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because the relief sought has already been granted.
Summary
The petitioner filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing Respondent No.3 to issue a Registration Certificate of Paramedical Counsel. During the pendency of the petition, the certificate was issued, as acknowledged by Respondent No.3's counsel and not contested by the petitioner. The court held that the petitioner's grievance was thereby redressed. Consequently, the petition was deemed infructuous. The court ordered the petition to be closed.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate remedy when the relief sought in a writ petition has already been granted?
- Whether the writ petition becomes infructuous upon the issuance of the registration certificate?
Subjects
- writ of mandamus
- registration certificate
- paramedical counsel
- infructuous petition
- high court
Judgment
22-ASWP-12987-2025.DOC
Shephali
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 12987 OF 2025
Shaikh Rahin Afzal …Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra through the …Respondents
Government Pleader & Ors.
Ms Pratiksha Keni Bhandari h/f Shivshankar D. Patil, for Petitioner.
Ms PJ Gavhane, AGP, for the Respondent-State.
Mr Sagar Talekar, for Respondent No.3.
CORAM: SUMAN SHYAM &
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.
DATED: 23rd SEPTEMBER 2026.
PC:-
1. This Writ Petition has been filed primarily seeking a Writ of
SHEPHALI Mandamus directing the Respondent No. 3 to issue Registration
SANJAY
MORMARE Certificate of Paramedical Counsel to the Petitioner. During the
Digitally signed by
SHEPHALI SANJAY
MORMARE pendency of the Writ Petition the Registration Certificate has been
Date: 2026.09.23
14:51:04 +0530
granted to the Petitioner, which is apparent from the submission of
Mr Sagar Talekar, learned counsel for the Respondent No. 3. The
Petitioner’s counsel has also not denied or disputed this fact.
2. If that be so, the grievance of the Petitioner has apparently
been redressed and, therefore, the Writ Petition has become
infructuous.
3. Consequently, the Writ Petition is closed.
(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (SUMAN SHYAM, J.)
{
Page 1 of 1
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.