Bombay High Court
MAHESH SHANKARLALA SHANKARPELLIversusTHE DISTRICT COLLECTOR AND OTHERS
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The petition is dismissed as infructuous because of the efflux of time.
Summary
Ms. Aishwarya N. Tanpure, filing a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, sought relief against the District Collector and others. The petitioner’s counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous because of the passage of time. The Court examined whether a writ petition can be entertained after it has become stale. Relying on the principle that a petition must be timely and that delay defeats the purpose of a writ, the Court held the petition could not proceed. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition becomes infructuous due to lapse of time and therefore cannot be entertained
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- lapse of time
- civil procedure
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:39767
1
4-wp-13078-2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 13078 OF 2023
Mahesh Shankarlala Shankarpelli
VERSUS
The District Collector And Others
...
Ms. Aishwarya N. Tanpure h/f Mr. Ravindra V. Gore, Advocate
for the Petitioner
Mr. K. B. Jadhavar, AGP for Respondent
…..
CORAM : AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J.
DATED : 31ST AUGUST, 2026
P.C. :-
. Ms. Aishwarya N. Tanpure h/f Mr. Ravindra V. Gore,
learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that by efflux of
time, the Writ Petition has become infructuous.
2. In view of the above, Writ Petition stands disposed of as
infructuous.
( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. )
Rushikesh/2026
Checking your session…