Bombay High Court
VAISHNAVI SUDHAKAR LOLAPOD AND ANOTHERversusTHE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
- Disposal
- DISPOSED OFF
Holding
The court directed the Scrutiny Committee to pronounce its order within two weeks and disposed of the writ petition.
Summary
Petitioners Vaishnavi Sudhakar Lolapod and another filed a writ petition against the State of Maharashtra. The petition sought relief pending a decision by the Scrutiny Committee. The State, through its Additional Government Pleader, waived service of notice. The court noted that the Scrutiny Committee had already concluded its hearing and the matter was reserved for orders. The court directed the Scrutiny Committee to pronounce its order within two weeks and consequently disposed of the writ petition.
Subjects
- writ petition
- procedural direction
- scrutiny committee
- disposal of petition
Judgment
2026:BHC-AUG:46359-DB
7 WP NO. 13087 OF 2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 13087 OF 2026
Vaishnavi Sudhakar Lolapod And Another
VERSUS
The State Of Maharashtra Through Secretary And Another
…
• Mr. S. G. Jayewar, Advocate for the Petitioners
• Mr. K. N. Lokhande, AGP for Respondents - State
…
CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT &
JITENDRA JAIN, JJ.
DATE : 30th SEPTEMBER, 2026
PER COURT :
1. Heard.
2. Issue notice to the respondents. Learned AGP waives service
of notice for the respondents – State.
3. Learned AGP informs us that hearing before respondent No.
2 – Scrutiny Committee has already concluded and the matter is
reserved for orders. If the order is yet to be pronounced, we direct
respondent No. 2 – Scrutiny Committee to pronounce the same
within two (02) weeks from today.
4. With the above direction, the writ petition stands disposed
of.
[JITENDRA JAIN, J.] [KISHORE C. SANT, J.]
Jhs/ 1/1
Checking your session…